My sense is that this is a power user feature and the majority of people (normies) won't care. Already there's overwhelm when trying to implement these models. Looking at the dropdown for ChatGPT is a bad UX.
I think yes and no? Like, absolutely, a drop-down isn't what most people want. But I think you can build a much better chatbot by using the "personalities" of the ones that already exist, and either letting people get answers from all of them at once (in some sane way) or automatically choosing the right one, than you can by making your chatbot the best one at everything. In other words, if OpenAI wanted to sell a chatbot (which they very well may not) making the ergonomics of that sort of product work seems more useful than spending astronomical amounts of money to compete to sometimes be a marginally better model.
"The first rule of being a differentist is to use different words than everyone else.".. #Innovation #GOLD
We call it a differentism
> and the ability choose between different models
My sense is that this is a power user feature and the majority of people (normies) won't care. Already there's overwhelm when trying to implement these models. Looking at the dropdown for ChatGPT is a bad UX.
I think yes and no? Like, absolutely, a drop-down isn't what most people want. But I think you can build a much better chatbot by using the "personalities" of the ones that already exist, and either letting people get answers from all of them at once (in some sane way) or automatically choosing the right one, than you can by making your chatbot the best one at everything. In other words, if OpenAI wanted to sell a chatbot (which they very well may not) making the ergonomics of that sort of product work seems more useful than spending astronomical amounts of money to compete to sometimes be a marginally better model.
Billion dollar bulldozers morphed into effective picks and shovels overnight.
And also, $340 billion dollar bulldozers https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openaiin-talks-for-huge-investment-round-valuing-it-up-to-300-billion-2a2d4327
Unhinged reasoning shows that we can create neurotic AI. I’m sure there will be no downstream consequences.
Just some stuff to tell us why we bought Bitcoin, probably